翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. Nice
・ United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar
・ United States v. Nixon
・ United States v. Nosal
・ United States v. O'Brien
・ United States v. O'Hagan
・ United States v. O'Hara
・ United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative
・ United States v. Olano
・ United States v. Olofson
・ United States v. One Book Called Ulysses
・ United States v. One Package of Japanese Pessaries
・ United States v. Oppenheimer
・ United States v. Oregon
・ United States v. Ortiz
United States v. Pace
・ United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
・ United States v. Park
・ United States v. Parke, Davis & Co.
・ United States v. Patane
・ United States v. Paul
・ United States v. Payner
・ United States v. Peoni
・ United States v. Perez
・ United States v. Peters
・ United States v. Peters (1795)
・ United States v. Phellis
・ United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank
・ United States v. Pineda-Moreno
・ United States v. Pink


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Pace : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Pace
United States v. Pace (955 F.2d 270 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 883 (1992)) is a United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit court decision relating to the open fields doctrine limiting the scope of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Acting on a tip, Texas investigators, entered onto the defendant’s property in Travis County and peeked through a hole in a barn where they discovered marijuana being cultivated. With this information the officers gained a search warrant, which they used to search the property. The defendant was eventually arrested, tried and convicted for ''possession with intent to distribute''. The defendant challenged on Fourth Amendment grounds, claiming that the barn was inside the "curtilage" of his home. The court found that it was not and that the search was legal pursuant to the "open fields" doctrine. The court held that the search was constitutional and that the barn was not within the curtilage of the appellant's home because the barn was located a significant distance from the house, was separated from the house by an interior fence, was not being used for activities associated with the intimacies of home life, and was readily visible from the surrounding area.
==References==

*(Case Text )


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Pace」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.